What did the FCC say Pacifica did wrong?
Second, the FCC argued that it reasonably concluded that the Carlin monologue was “indecent.” To support this, the FCC stated, “[Pacifica] abused its special trust by broadcasting for nearly twelve minutes a record which repeated over and over words which depict sexual and excretory organs and activities in a manner …
Who won the FCC vs Pacifica case?
Holding. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the FCC’s actions in 1978, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruling that the routine was “indecent but not obscene”. The Court recognized the government had strong interests in: Shielding children from potentially offensive material, and.
What is indecent FCC?
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) defines indecent speech as material that, in context, depicts or describes sexual or excretory organs or activities in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium. …
What are the 7 words you can’t say on the radio?
The words, in the order Carlin listed them, are: “shit”, “piss”, “fuck”, “cunt”, “cocksucker”, “motherfucker”, and “tits”. At the time, the words were considered highly inappropriate and unsuitable for broadcast on the public airwaves in the United States, whether radio or television.
Which is true about the 1968 legal case Ginsberg v New York?
In Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968), the Supreme Court upheld a harmful to minors, or “obscene as to minors,” law, affirming the illegality of giving persons under 17 years of age access to expressions or depictions of nudity and sexual content for “monetary consideration.”
What is considered obscene by law?
Obscenity is not protected under First Amendment rights to free speech, and violations of federal obscenity laws are criminal offenses. Obscenity is defined as anything that fits the criteria of the Miller test, which may include, for example, visual depictions, spoken words, or written text.
How much is an FCC fine?
For broadcast radio and television stations and cable operators, the Enforcement Bureau says the new daily maximum penalty for each violation will be $51,827 up to a maximum of $518,283 for any single violation or failure to comply with FCC rules.
What are the 8 swear words?
What words are cuss words?
What the cuss? 50 swear-word alternatives
- Balderdash!
- William Shatner!
- Corn Nuts!
- Dagnabbit!
- Son of a monkey!
- Barnacles!
- Holy cow!
- Poo on a stick!
Who won Ginsberg v New York?
6–3 decision In a 6-3 decision written by Justice William Brennan, the Court held that Section 484-h did not violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments as a restriction on expression.
Are lolis illegal in the US?
Possessing child pornography is illegal in the United States. Because lolicon depicts an identifiable minor engaged in sexually explicit situations, loli violates federal law in the United States. You can be arrested and charged with a crime if you possess lolicon in any form.
What was the case FCC vs Pacifica Foundation?
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation. Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that defined the power of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) over indecent material as applied to broadcasting.
How did the Supreme Court decide the Pacifica case?
Pacifica appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. That court reversed and ruled in favor of Pacifica. One of the three judges on the panel said the FCC had violated Pacifica’s freedom of speech. The FCC took the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
What did Pacifica Foundation say in Filthy Words?
438 U.S. 726 A radio station of respondent Pacifica Foundation (hereinafter respondent) made an afternoon broadcast of a satiric monologue, entitled “Filthy Words,” which listed and repeated a variety of colloquial uses of “words you couldn’t say on the public airwaves.”
How is Pacifica’s broadcast protected by the First Amendment?
Pacifica makes two constitutional attacks on the Commission’s order. First, it argues that the Commission’s construction of the statutory language broadly encompasses so much constitutionally protected speech that reversal is required even if Pacifica’s broadcast of the “Filthy Words” monologue is not itself protected by the First Amendment.